ABSTRACT
Background: Foundation training in the UK has been impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic. Surgical education in particular has been impacted due to the reduced exposure of teaching in theatres and clinics. To combat this waning exposure, an online teaching series for the foundation doctors, in affiliation with the Royal College of Surgeons of Edinburgh, was designed and delivered nationally during the pandemic. The aim of this study is to assess the feasibility and the reception of an online teaching programme to become an integral part of surgical education. Methods: A series of virtual teaching sessions lasting between 30 and 60 mintues were delivered live by senior surgical trainees and consultants to foundation trainees nationwide. Online feedback was completed after each session and the results were analysed using Microsoft Excel™. Results: 95.2% of the foundation trainees felt more confident on the subjects taught and were satisfied with the teaching series. The majority of the trainees preferred sessions which were short, held every two or three weeks, delivered by senior surgeons, covering a wide range of surgical specialties and conditions. Conclusion: An online surgical teaching series has been shown to be well received by foundation trainees. It provides a realistic opportunity to have a blended learning environment for surgical training nationally during the pandemic.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The Covid-19 pandemic has led to the introduction of conservative non-operative approaches to surgical management favouring community driven care. The aim of this study was to determine the effect of these pathways on patients attending a surgical assessment unit (SAU). METHOD: This was a retrospective observational cohort study. We included all consecutive attendances to the SAU in April 2020 (Covid-19 period) and April 2019 (pre-Covid-19). The Covid-19 period saw a shift in clinical practice towards a more conservative approach to the management of acute surgical presentations. The primary outcome measure was 30-day readmission. The secondary outcome measures were length of hospital stay, inpatient investigations undertaken and 30-day mortality. RESULTS: A total of 451 patients were included. This represented 277 and 174 attendances in pre-Covid-19, and Covid-19 groups respectively. The rates of unplanned 30-day readmission rates in the Covid-19 and pre-Covid-19 periods were 16.7% and 12.6% respectively (P = 0.232). There were significantly fewer planned follow-ups in the Covid-19 (36.2%) compared to the pre-Covid-19 group (49.1%; P < 0.01; OR 1.7, 95% CI 1.15-2.51). There were no significant differences in length of hospital stay (P = 0.802), and 30-day mortality rate (P = 0.716; OR 1.9, 95% CI 0.38-9.54) between the two periods. CONCLUSION: There were no differences in 30-day readmission rates, length of hospital stay, and 30-day mortality with the changes to pathways. Our findings suggest the resource efficient conservative Covid-19 pathways could potentially continue long-term. However, further multi-centre studies with larger sample sizes and longer follow-up duration will be required to validate our findings.